Kaagazaat

Fill in your details

Revocation of a Gift Deed

Answer what you can. The draft beside these boxes is rewritten as you go, so you can see exactly what each answer does to the document.

What you type stays in this browser. Nothing is sent anywhere until you choose to keep a copy — and closing this tab loses it.

Your answers

Nothing answered yet. There are 36 questions on this form.

Still to answer

36 answers are still to come.

Nothing is amiss in what you have written. The document is simply not finished, and the draft marks each gap where an answer will go.

  1. Donor and donee
  2. The property and title
  3. The transaction
  4. The revocation
  5. Signing and witnesses

Step 1 of 5

Donor and donee

For example: Harpreet Singh

What is the donor address?Needed

For example: Aarav Singh

What is the donee address?Needed

For example: Father and son

Read the whole draft

Clearing empties every box on this form, and there is no way back to what was in them.

The live draft

The draft, as it stands

This is the whole document, not a sample of it. It is rewritten every time you change an answer.

A long blank line — __________ — stands wherever an answer has not been given. It is left that visible on purpose, so an unfinished document cannot be mistaken for a finished one.

No answer has been given, so every place a detail belongs is standing blank. The shape of the document is worth reading even now.

REVOCATION OF A GIFT DEED

Revocation date: __________

Donor: __________, __________. Donee: __________, __________. Relationship: __________.

Property: __________; __________. Regime: __________. Title source: __________. Title nature: __________. Value: __________.

Original gift: __________, dated __________.

GROUND

Ground: __________. Original clause: __________. Facts: __________. Donee position: __________.

EFFECT SOUGHT

This instrument seeks only the revocation effect permitted by section 126 and does not state that a disputed registered title is erased merely by unilateral declaration. Existing encumbrances: __________. Dues: __________. Authority status: __________. Registration office: __________. Property schedule: __________. Possession context: __________.

RECORD PARTICULARS

What is the deed execution date? __________

How is absence of consideration stated? __________

What does donor state about capacity? __________

How is acceptance recorded? __________

REVOCATION IS EXCEPTIONAL

The starting point is that a completed gift is not revocable at pleasure. The deed therefore identifies the exact section 126 mechanism or rescission ground before describing any title consequence.

DISPUTED TITLE SAFEGUARD

Where the donee denies the alleged event or ground, this instrument is evidence of the donor position rather than a declaration that title has already reverted. The public record should change only through a lawful consensual instrument, adjudication or other recognised route.

LEGAL BASIS

Punjab: Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 governs revocation and rejects a power revocable merely at the donor will. Where a lawful instrument itself extinguishes rights created by a registered immovable-property gift, section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 applies and section 23 gives four months for presentation. For authority-allotted property, the Punjab development-authority file must also reflect the lawful result. A refusal to register follows sections 72 or 73 of the Registration Act, 1908 according to the ground of refusal. Separately, where the donor is a senior citizen and the gift was made subject to the condition that the donee provide the donor with basic amenities and basic physical needs, section 23(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 lets the Maintenance Tribunal declare the transfer void, at the donor's option, if the donee refuses or fails to provide them. The condition must be written into the transfer itself (Sudesh Chhikara v. Ramti Devi, 2022). That is an application to the Tribunal, which this instrument cannot replace.

Chandigarh: Section 126 governs the revocation ground and section 17 of the Registration Act governs a registrable instrument extinguishing the property right. The Sub-Registrar, UT Chandigarh receives the instrument; for sector/estate property the Estate Office file under the 1952 Act and 2007 Rules must then be corrected. The exact Estate Office fee/appeal route was not confirmed. A refusal to register follows sections 72 or 73 of the Registration Act, 1908 according to the ground of refusal. The section 23 route under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is open in Chandigarh on the same terms.

PERSONAL DATA NOTICE

This notice is given under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

The purpose of collecting personal data in this revocation instrument is to identify the original gift, parties, property and the specific section 126 ground relied upon to reverse or challenge the transfer.

The record will be held by __________ and may be shared with the donor, donee, Sub-Registrar, relevant property authority, court or advocate handling the revocation dispute.

If the matter does not proceed, the personal data will be retained for 90 days and then erased. If the matter proceeds, the record will be retained for the matter plus 12 months, except where a statute requires a longer named retention period.

A person named in this document may request correction or erasure where the purpose has ended, withdraw consent for future consent-based processing, or raise a grievance by writing to __________. The record-holder should acknowledge and reply within 30 days.

Data minimisation: this document does not collect a full Aadhaar number, an Aadhaar-card copy, a password or bank credentials.

Personal-data instruction: __________.

SIGNATURE

Donor / Revoking Party: __________

Witness 1: __________, __________

Witness 2: __________, __________

The rest stays out of view until every answer is in.

KAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINALKAAGAZAAT — PREVIEW, NOT FINAL

REVOCATION OF A GIFT DEED

Revocation date: __________

Donor: __________, __________. Donee: __________, __________. Relationship: __________.

Property: __________; __________. Regime: __________. Title source: __________. Title nature: __________. Value: __________.

Original gift: __________, dated __________.

GROUND

Ground: __________. Original clause: __________. Facts: __________. Donee position: __________.

EFFECT SOUGHT

This instrument seeks only the revocation effect permitted by section 126 and does not state that a disputed registered title is erased merely by unilateral declaration. Existing encumbrances: __________. Dues: __________. Authority status: __________. Registration office: __________. Property schedule: __________. Possession context: __________.

RECORD PARTICULARS

What is the deed execution date? __________

How is absence of consideration stated? __________

What does donor state about capacity? __________

How is acceptance recorded? __________

REVOCATION IS EXCEPTIONAL

The starting point is that a completed gift is not revocable at pleasure. The deed therefore identifies the exact section 126 mechanism or rescission ground before describing any title consequence.

DISPUTED TITLE SAFEGUARD

Where the donee denies the alleged event or ground, this instrument is evidence of the donor position rather than a declaration that title has already reverted. The public record should change only through a lawful consensual instrument, adjudication or other recognised route.

LEGAL BASIS

Punjab: Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 governs revocation and rejects a power revocable merely at the donor will. Where a lawful instrument itself extinguishes rights created by a registered immovable-property gift, section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 applies and section 23 gives four months for presentation. For authority-allotted property, the Punjab development-authority file must also reflect the lawful result. A refusal to register follows sections 72 or 73 of the Registration Act, 1908 according to the ground of refusal. Separately, where the donor is a senior citizen and the gift was made subject to the condition that the donee provide the donor with basic amenities and basic physical needs, section 23(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 lets the Maintenance Tribunal declare the transfer void, at the donor's option, if the donee refuses or fails to provide them. The condition must be written into the transfer itself (Sudesh Chhikara v. Ramti Devi, 2022). That is an application to the Tribunal, which this instrument cannot replace.

Chandigarh: Section 126 governs the revocation ground and section 17 of the Registration Act governs a registrable instrument extinguishing the property right. The Sub-Registrar, UT Chandigarh receives the instrument; for sector/estate property the Estate Office file under the 1952 Act and 2007 Rules must then be corrected. The exact Estate Office fee/appeal route was not confirmed. A refusal to register follows sections 72 or 73 of the Registration Act, 1908 according to the ground of refusal. The section 23 route under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is open in Chandigarh on the same terms.

PERSONAL DATA NOTICE

This notice is given under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

The purpose of collecting personal data in this revocation instrument is to identify the original gift, parties, property and the specific section 126 ground relied upon to reverse or challenge the transfer.

The record will be held by __________ and may be shared with the donor, donee, Sub-Registrar, relevant property authority, court or advocate handling the revocation dispute.

If the matter does not proceed, the personal data will be retained for 90 days and then erased. If the matter proceeds, the record will be retained for the matter plus 12 months, except where a statute requires a longer named retention period.

A person named in this document may request correction or erasure where the purpose has ended, withdraw consent for future consent-based processing, or raise a grievance by writing to __________. The record-holder should acknowledge and reply within 30 days.

Data minimisation: this document does not collect a full Aadhaar number, an Aadhaar-card copy, a password or bank credentials.

Personal-data instruction: __________.

SIGNATURE

Donor / Revoking Party: __________

Witness 1: __________, __________

Witness 2: __________, __________

Reading costs nothing. Keeping a copy needs an account.

The opening of the draft is on this page as you answer it. Once every answer is in, the button below opens the whole draft, watermarked — still without an account. Printing it, or keeping a clean copy, is where an account is asked for. That is the whole arrangement.

A kept copy has to belong to somebody, and that is the reason for the account. There is nothing further to it.

Continue to download

Carry on reading without one

Back to what this document is