ਕਾਗਜ਼ਾਤ

Application for Partition (Taqseem) of a Joint Holding, with Oral (Family) Partition Memorandum

ਇੱਕ ਨਜ਼ਰ ਵਿੱਚ

ਕੀਮਤ: ₹99 · GST ਸ਼ਾਮਲ
ਸਟਾਂਪ ਡਿਊਟੀ: Two separate stamp questions, and it is fatal to run them together.
ਰਜਿਸਟਰੀ: The Part I application is filed with the Revenue Officer, not a Sub-Registrar — online under the Takseem scheme, at the tehsil counter, or at a Sewa Kendra (online verifies the applicant by mobile OTP).
ਗਵਾਹ: Two, matching Punjab's minimum for a Partition Deed (Sub-Registrar FAQ, Q13).

₹99

GST ਸ਼ਾਮਲ

ਲਾਂਚ ਮਿਆਦ: ਹੁਣੇ ਡਾਊਨਲੋਡ ਮੁਫ਼ਤ ਹਨ। ਦਿਖਾਈਆਂ ਕੀਮਤਾਂ ਭੁਗਤਾਨ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਹੋਣ ’ਤੇ ਲਾਗੂ ਹੋਣਗੀਆਂ।

ਆਸਾਨ ਸਵਾਲ, ਪੂਰਾ ਡਰਾਫਟ ਸਕ੍ਰੀਨ ਉੱਤੇ, Word ਵਿੱਚ ਡਾਊਨਲੋਡ ਕਰੋ।

ਸਾਰੀਆਂ ਕੀਮਤਾਂ ਵੇਖੋ

ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨਾਵਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਵੀ

Taqseem application
Taqseem Arzi
Takseem
Taksim
Taqseem Nama
Batwara
Batwara Nama
Batwara Arzi

ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਆਪ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੈ। ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਾਗਜ਼ ਆਮ ਤੌਰ ਉੱਤੇ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਬਣਦੇ ਹਨ, ਅਤੇ ਰਜਿਸਟਰਾਰ, ਬੈਂਕ ਜਾਂ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਹੀ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਪੜ੍ਹੇ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਲਿਖੇ ਗਏ ਹਨ — ਇਸ ਲਈ ਇਹ ਮੰਚ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਨੁਵਾਦ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਦਾ। ਪੰਨੇ ਦੀ ਭਾਸ਼ਾ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਹੈ; ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਦੀ ਭਾਸ਼ਾ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ।

ਕੀ ਇਹ ਇੱਥੇ ਹੀ ਭਰਿਆ ਜਾ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ

ਇਹ ਇੱਥੇ ਹੀ ਭਰਿਆ ਜਾ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ

ਇਹ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਇਸੇ ਸਾਈਟ ਉੱਤੇ ਭਰ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ, ਅਤੇ ਕੁਝ ਵੀ ਤੈਅ ਕਰਨ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਪੂਰਾ ਖਰੜਾ ਸਕਰੀਨ ਉੱਤੇ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ। ਇਹ ਧਿਆਨ ਨਾਲ ਤਿਆਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਖਰੜਾ ਹੈ; ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਹਾਲਾਤ ਬਾਰੇ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ।

ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਭਰਨਾ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਕਰੋ

ਕਿਉਂ ਲੋੜ ਪੈਂਦੀ ਹੈ

ਕਦੋਂ ਲੋੜ ਪੈਂਦੀ ਹੈ

File with a Punjab Revenue Officer to turn jointly-held jamabandi land into separate khewats — a revenue matter, not a civil suit (Chapter IX, Punjab Land Revenue Act 1887: s.111 application, s.112 notice, s.117 title questions, s.118 mode of division, s.121 instrument of partition, s.158 bars the civil court on 23 matters including partition). Two routes. CONTESTED (co-sharers disagree, or one won't sign): needs an Assistant Collector First Grade or above (s.126, para 254 Punjab Land Administration Manual) — not the Naib Tehsildar who sanctions ordinary mutations. CONSENT (everyone agrees): runs under the Punjab Takseem scheme (from 13 April 2026) before the Circle Revenue Officer, a 30-day service, with the Patwari/Tehsildar taking signatures in the village. Answer the consent question accurately — it switches which recital/route print (clause 4.3) and whether the consent block prints. Part II (a Memorandum of an already-completed partition) prints only where BOTH the consent AND oral-partition-history fields are filled. Filling only the oral-partition fields pleads the old partition as fact in a contested case (clauses 2.3–2.4) without executing a memorandum; leaving both blank suits a fresh partition. Do NOT use this: for a registered Partition Deed before the Sub-Registrar (a different instrument); where the fight is over TITLE, not division (s.117; a civil suit lies only after the Revenue Officer declines under s.117(1), per Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules, Vol.1, Ch.2-B, para 3 — a jamabandi entry is only presumed true, s.44/45); to correct a wrong entry (a Fard Badar instead, paras 7.29–7.30, Punjab Land Records Manual); for shamilat deh vested in the Gram Panchayat (s.4, Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act 1961 — claims to the Collector under s.11, appeal to the Commissioner in 60 days, civil court barred by s.13); where the allotment would create a fragment below the notified standard area (VOID under ss.7–9, East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act 1948) or while consolidation is running (use the s.21 repartition route); or in Chandigarh, whose revenue villages sit with the UT's own Revenue Department and whose sector property has no jamabandi at all. Warning: Part II RECORDS a partition that already happened — it doesn't make one. Sign it to divide land today and call it old, and it is in law a chargeable, compulsorily-registrable instrument of partition regardless of the label.

ਸਟਾਂਪ ਡਿਊਟੀ, ਰਜਿਸਟਰੀ ਅਤੇ ਗਵਾਹ ਵੇਖੋ

ਹੇਠਾਂ ਜੋ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਹੈ ਉਹ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਲਈ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਉੱਥੋਂ ਦੀ ਹੀ ਸਥਿਤੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਗਈ ਹੈ, ਇਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਕਿੱਥੇ-ਕਿੱਥੇ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਬਦਲਦੀ ਹੈ — ਭਾਵ ਹੇਠਲੀਆਂ ਰਕਮਾਂ ਉਹੀ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਲਾਗੂ ਹੁੰਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਦਰਾਂ ਬਦਲਦੀਆਂ ਰਹਿੰਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ, ਇਸ ਲਈ ਸਬ-ਰਜਿਸਟਰਾਰ ਦਫ਼ਤਰ ਤੋਂ ਪੱਕਾ ਕਰ ਲੈਣਾ ਠੀਕ ਰਹਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਜੇ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਰਟੀ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਿਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਹੈ, ਤਾਂ ਇਸ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਕੁਝ ਵੀ ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਲਈ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ।

ਸਟਾਂਪ ਡਿਊਟੀ

Two separate stamp questions, and it is fatal to run them together. First, the application: a pleading, not a conveyance — no ad valorem duty, only COURT FEE (un-amended Court Fees Act 1870 as applicable to Punjab; a 2009 slab amendment has been stayed since 27 November 2013), paid by e-stamp. No published figure exists — ask the Ahlmad/Reader of the Revenue Officer's court. Second, larger: the s.121 instrument of partition, charged under Article 45, Schedule I-A, Indian Stamp Act 1899, on the SMALLER shares separated (Punjab Stamp Manual, Note 84: four equal shareholders pay on twelve annas in the rupee; a two-thirds sharer separating pays on one-third). Duty is deposited in CASH during the proceeding, stamp affixed to the final order after the appeal period (Financial Commissioner's Book Circulars XVI/XX of 1880); section 29(g) governs apportionment. The Article 45 RATE could not be confirmed from any primary source — get it from the Sub-Registrar or the Deputy Commissioner's stamp branch in writing before depositing anything; don't assume the sale rate (5% plus 1% cess plus 1% PIDB plus 0.25% SIDF). Valuation runs on consideration or the Collector Rate, whichever higher, revised annually per district/land class, effective 1 April. Two concessions, one arguable here: the women's 2% applies only to a Conveyance (entry 23), not a partition. The blood-relation remission (WHOLE duty, on a lifetime transfer to a child, grandchild, brother or sister, Order S.O.28/C.A.2/1899/S.9/2014, 7 May 2014) may or may not cover a partition between brothers — UNRESOLVED, since a partition is a severance, not a transfer; confirm in writing first. Even if it applies, it remits stamp duty only, not the registration fee, cess or PIDB levy. The Part II Memorandum is chargeable under Article 45 only if it itself divides the land, not if it merely records an old one (Kale v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, AIR 1976 SC 807; Roshan Singh v. Zile Singh, AIR 1988 SC 881) — officials look through the label. Undervaluation risks a section 47-A reference to the Collector; section 35 bars an unstamped instrument from evidence. E-stamp certificates are mandatory above Rs 19,999 (Punjab e-Stamp Rules 2014) — don't buy one early, since unlocked certificates/receipts lapse after four and one months respectively. This is a Punjab instrument; every figure above is Punjab's. Chandigarh runs no Takseem scheme and prices a partition differently (its own calculator, not the published schedule, returns 2%, 1% registration capped at Rs 10,000, Rs 20 pasting, none of Punjab's add-ons) — a joint holding in a Chandigarh revenue village belongs with the UT's own Revenue Department instead.

ਰਜਿਸਟਰੀ

The Part I application is filed with the Revenue Officer, not a Sub-Registrar — online under the Takseem scheme, at the tehsil counter, or at a Sewa Kendra (online verifies the applicant by mobile OTP). Compulsory is the mutation ENTRY — a partition never reaching the jamabandi has changed nothing a bank or buyer can see. Mutation fee Rs 600 (section 38, Punjab Land Revenue Act 1887) plus Rs 200 pasting, but partition multiplies it: a SEPARATE fee per new holding, and again for the shamilat (section 38(2); para 7.33, Punjab Land Records Manual), recovered at attestation. Four brothers dividing a khewat with a shamilat share owe five fees. A mutation finalised by 15 June goes into that year's jamabandi (para 7.56); otherwise it waits for the next quinquennial cycle, though valid from the order date regardless. The needed fard costs, from the Patwari, Rs 20 per page (jamabandi copy), Rs 20 flat (Fard Haqiat) or Rs 20 per four fields (tatima shajra) (para 3.48, Punjab Land Records Manual, Rule 71); a computerised nakal from a Fard/Sewa Kendra is separately charged under Rule 71-B at an unstated amount — confirm on screen first. Time limits: consent partition is a 30-day notified service (+2 days at a Sewa/Fard/Saanjh Kendra; appeal to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate then the Deputy Commissioner if missed); mutation attestation is a separate 45-day service. A voluntary registered Partition Deed instead: compulsorily registrable (section 17(1)(b), Registration Act 1908), present within four months (sections 23/32/34) or inadmissible (section 49; a further four condonable under section 25 on ten times the fee); fee 1% of value (minimum Rs 50, maximum Rs 2,00,000) plus facilitation charges (Rs 1,000/3,000/5,000 by consideration slab) and Rs 200 pasting; needs a Nakal Jamabandi, ID, two photos, Form 61/60. The section 121 instrument differs from this deed — ask the Sub-Registrar if it's separately presented locally. Part II is registrable only if it itself divides the land, not if merely recording an old one (Kale v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, AIR 1976 SC 807; Roshan Singh v. Zile Singh, AIR 1988 SC 881). Appeal against a Revenue Officer's order: Collector (30 days), Commissioner (60), Financial Commissioner (90) (sections 13–14; no second appeal if confirmed on first; review under section 15, revision under section 16). An order on the MODE of partition is understood — not verified against the Act's text — to be unappealable under section 118(2); argue the mode while the case is open.

ਨੋਟਰੀ

Nothing requires the section 111 application to be notarised or sworn — the applicant's verification clause suffices. Notarise instead: an attorney's power of attorney (section 33, Registration Act 1908); a consent-identity affidavit for an absent co-sharer; a guardian's-authority affidavit for a minor/unsound-mind co-sharer; and the applicant's affidavit that nobody's omitted. Affidavits go on non-judicial stamp paper or e-stamp (mandatory above Rs 19,999, Punjab e-Stamp Rules 2014). The Article 4 value itself isn't on the Revenue Department's table — ask first; the wrong denomination is refused at the window. Use a Notaries Act 1952 advocate-notary and confirm his registration number and register entry. Notarisation doesn't stamp, register, or make Part II operative: a memorandum recording an old partition is evidence only; one purporting to divide land today is unregistered and inadmissible (section 49, Registration Act 1908) regardless of any seal. The Takseem route works because consent is proved to the Revenue Officer directly, not because a notary saw it.

ਗਵਾਹ

Two, matching Punjab's minimum for a Partition Deed (Sub-Registrar FAQ, Q13). They attest only what they saw: the Applicant always, and co-sharers too wherever the consent block or Part II prints. Strictly, section 111 needs no attesting witness in law; witnesses matter for Part II, where the Revenue Officer tests the claimed old partition against the khasra girdawari, revenue payments, tubewells and boundaries. Choose the Lambardar or a long-resident cultivator over an outsider. No statutory bar on an interested witness (section 67, Indian Succession Act 1925 is a will provision, inapplicable here), but avoid a co-sharer/spouse/beneficiary as prudence. Adults of sound mind, full details. Separately (the substance): every recorded co-sharer must sign the consent block for a consent partition; without it, the case is contested, before an Assistant Collector First Grade (section 126) — notice still issues under section 112, others may be added under section 113. More co-sharers than four spaces: use the annexed sheet. Bring ID/photos for co-sharers and witnesses alike (Form 61/60). A minor can neither witness nor consent.

ਇਸ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਬਾਰੇ ਵਕੀਲ ਨਾਲ ਗੱਲ ਕਰੋ₹3,539 GST ਸਮੇਤ (₹2,999 + 18% GST), ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ਸਟੈਂਪ ਪੇਪਰ ਲਈ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਕਰੋ

Sample preview — placeholder answers, not your data

KAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASED

APPLICATION FOR PARTITION (TAQSEEM) OF A JOINT HOLDING
UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE PUNJAB LAND REVENUE ACT, 1887,
WITH MEMORANDUM OF ORAL (FAMILY) PARTITION

BEFORE THE Tehsildar, exercising the powers of an Assistant Collector First Grade,
TEHSIL Phillaur, DISTRICT Jalandhar, PUNJAB

IN THE MATTER OF: Khewat / Khatauni No. Khewat No. 112, Khatauni No. 148 of the Jamabandi for the year 2021-22 of Village Rurka Kalan, Hadbast No. 231, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar, Punjab;

AND IN THE MATTER OF: An application under sections 111 and 112 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 for partition of the said joint holding.

APPLICANT

Gurmeet Singh, son / daughter / wife of Sh. Jagtar Singh, resident of House No. 41, Ward No. 3, Village Rurka Kalan, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar, Punjab 144411, mobile +91 XXXXX XXXXX, email gurmeet.singh@example.com, recorded co-sharer to the extent of 1/4 share in the joint holding described in Schedule A below (the "Applicant").

OTHER RECORDED CO-SHARERS (RESPONDENTS)

Sh. Balwinder Singh son of Sh. Jagtar Singh, resident of Village Rurka Kalan, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar — 1/4 share
Sh. Sukhdev Singh son of Sh. Jagtar Singh, resident of Village Rurka Kalan, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar — 1/4 share
Smt. Harbans Kaur widow of Sh. Jagtar Singh, resident of Village Rurka Kalan, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar — 1/4 share

The Applicant and the persons named above are together called the "Co-sharers".

RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

THE JOINT HOLDING

1.1 The Co-sharers are jointly recorded as owners of the land described in Schedule A, measuring 31 kanal 12 marla in the aggregate, being land Chahi (well-irrigated), situated in the revenue estate of Village Rurka Kalan, Hadbast No. 231, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar, Punjab (the "Joint Holding").

1.2 The shares of the Co-sharers are already entered in the annual record. A Fard / Nakal Jamabandi for the year 2021-22, issued on 1 April 2026, is filed with this application in proof, together with the aks shajra (tatima) of the khasra numbers listed in Schedule A.

1.3 By this application the Applicant does not ask the Revenue Officer to declare title. The Applicant is aware that under section 44 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 an entry in the record-of-rights or the annual record is presumed to be true only until the contrary is proved or a new entry is lawfully substituted; that under section 45 of that Act a person aggrieved by an entry must seek a declaratory decree, now under section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963; and that a question of title arising in these proceedings falls to be dealt with under section 117 of the Act.

1.4 SHAMILAT. The ownership column of the jamabandi has been examined for an entry of shamilat deh — Jumla Malkan Wa Digar Haqdaran Arazi Hassab Rasad, Jumla Malkan or Mushtarka Malkan. Any such entry, and what follows from it, is stated in the paragraph immediately following this one. Where no such paragraph appears, the khewat carries no share in the shamilat deh.
A share in the shamilat deh is recorded against the khewat, entered in the ownership column as Jumla Malkan Wa Digar Haqdaran Arazi Hassab Rasad. That form of entry falls within the definition of shamilat deh in section 2(g) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. A separate mutation fee is leviable on it when the partition is entered, under section 38(2) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and paragraph 7.33 of the Punjab Land Records Manual. The Applicant does not by this application raise any claim of right, title or interest in shamilat land which has vested in the Gram Panchayat under section 4 of the Act of 1961; such a claim lies to the Collector under section 11 of that Act, with an appeal to the Commissioner within sixty days, the civil court being barred by section 13.

POSSESSION AND CULTIVATION

2.1 The whole of the joint holding is under the self-cultivation (khudkasht) of the recorded co-sharers.

2.2 The khasra girdawari of the Joint Holding stands as recorded by the Patwari of the halqa for the current and preceding harvests, and the Applicant relies upon those entries as to possession. The Applicant requests that the Patwari be directed to produce the girdawari for the last five harvests.

2.3 THE EARLIER ORAL (FAMILY) PARTITION, PLEADED AS A FACT. The Joint Holding was orally partitioned among the family on or about 2 April 2026, and the parcels have been held, possessed, cultivated and enjoyed by the respective Co-sharers separately and to the exclusion of one another for more than twenty-seven years, that is since the Rabi harvest of 1998. How that partition was made, and what each branch of the family took, was as follows. In the Rabi harvest of 1998, in the presence of the Lambardar and the elders of the biradari assembled at the village dharamshala, the late Sh. Jagtar Singh divided the joint holding among his three sons. Killa No. 12//5 was given to Gurmeet Singh, Killa No. 12//6 to Balwinder Singh and Killa No. 13//1 to Sukhdev Singh, while Killa No. 12//15 was kept by Sh. Jagtar Singh for himself and passed on his death in 2014 to his widow Smt. Harbans Kaur. Boundaries (vatt) were raised the same season and have stood since. No consideration passed and no writing was made at the time.

2.4 THAT SEPARATE POSSESSION, AND HOW IT CAN BE CHECKED AGAINST THE RECORD. The khasra girdawari has shown each of the four parcels under the separate cultivation of the respective co-sharer at every harvest since Rabi 1998. Separate PSPCL agricultural connections stand in the names of Gurmeet Singh (AP/JL/1147) and Balwinder Singh (AP/JL/1163). Crop loans from the Rurka Kalan Cooperative Agricultural Service Society Ltd. have been raised separately by each co-sharer against his own parcel since 2003. The boundaries raised in 1998 are visible on the aks shajra and can be verified by the Patwari of the halqa on the spot. The Applicant asks the Revenue Officer to read this account together with the khasra girdawari and to satisfy himself that the division now sought is the division which has already taken place on the ground. The Applicant states expressly that the partition recited above was made and acted upon long before this application, and that nothing in this application, or in any memorandum filed with it, divides the Joint Holding afresh.

WHY PARTITION IS SOUGHT

3.1 Joint ownership of the Joint Holding has become inconvenient and unworkable. Each Co-sharer wishes his or her share to stand as a separate khewat in the jamabandi, so that it may be cultivated, improved, mortgaged, leased, sold or inherited without the concurrence of the others, and so that each may deal with a lender, a purchaser and the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited in his or her own right.

3.2 It is the record that stands in the way. A bank will not lend against an undivided share in a joint khewat, a purchaser will not complete on one, and an heir cannot be shown the field that is his. Only a separate khewat cures that.

THE FORUM, AND THE BASIS ON WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS TAKEN

4.1 Partition of land held jointly is a matter for a Revenue Officer under Chapter IX of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, and the jurisdiction of the civil courts over it is barred by section 158 of that Act, sub-section (2) of which excludes, among other matters, any claim for partition of an estate, holding or tenancy, any question connected with or arising out of proceedings for partition not being a question as to title, and the allotment of land on partition.

ਇਸ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਨਾਲ ਅਕਸਰ ਇਹ ਵੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੇ ਹਨ

ਦਾਨ, ਵਿਰਾਸਤ ਅਤੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰਕ ਵੰਡ ਉੱਤੇ ਵਾਪਸ