ਕਾਗਜ਼ਾਤ

Application to Waive the Six-Month Period (Section 13-B(2))

ਇੱਕ ਨਜ਼ਰ ਵਿੱਚ

ਕੀਮਤ: ਮੁਫ਼ਤ
ਸਟਾਂਪ ਡਿਊਟੀ: This application claims no monetary relief and is not itself an instrument creating or transferring a right, so no stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 is payable on it, in Punjab or in Chandigarh; a small fixed court-fee stamp under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as applicable in each place is the only charge, if the specific court's practice asks for one on an interim application of this kind.
ਰਜਿਸਟਰੀ: Not a registrable instrument.
ਗਵਾਹ: No attesting witnesses are required for the application itself.

ਮੁਫ਼ਤ

ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਮੁਫ਼ਤ ਹਨ। ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਕਿੱਟਾਂ ਦੇ ਪੈਸੇ ਲੱਗਦੇ ਹਨ।

ਆਸਾਨ ਸਵਾਲ, ਪੂਰਾ ਡਰਾਫਟ ਸਕ੍ਰੀਨ ਉੱਤੇ, Word ਵਿੱਚ ਡਾਊਨਲੋਡ ਕਰੋ।

ਸਾਰੀਆਂ ਕੀਮਤਾਂ ਵੇਖੋ

ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨਾਵਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਵੀ

Application for Waiver of Cooling Period
Amardeep Singh Application
Waiver of Statutory Period Divorce
छह महीने की अवधि माफ़ी हेतु आवेदन
ਛੇ ਮਹੀਨਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਮਿਆਦ ਮਾਫ਼ੀ ਲਈ ਅਰਜ਼ੀ

ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਆਪ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੈ। ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਾਗਜ਼ ਆਮ ਤੌਰ ਉੱਤੇ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਬਣਦੇ ਹਨ, ਅਤੇ ਰਜਿਸਟਰਾਰ, ਬੈਂਕ ਜਾਂ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਹੀ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਪੜ੍ਹੇ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਲਿਖੇ ਗਏ ਹਨ। ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ਾਂ ਦੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਅਨੁਵਾਦ ਨੂੰ ਅਸੀਂ ਜਾਂਚ ਕੇ ਮਨਜ਼ੂਰ ਕਰ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਾਂ, ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਲਈ ਇਹ ਮੰਚ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਉਹ ਅਨੁਵਾਦ ਵੀ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ; ਅਨੁਵਾਦ ਅਤੇ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਪਾਠ ਵਿੱਚ ਫ਼ਰਕ ਹੋਣ ਦੀ ਸੂਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਪਾਠ ਹੀ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ।

ਕਦੋਂ ਲੋੜ ਪੈਂਦੀ ਹੈ

Both spouses have already presented the first motion of a mutual-consent divorce petition under section 13-B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and want the Family Court to waive the six-month period that section 13-B(2) otherwise requires before the second motion can be moved. In Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, (2017) 8 SCC 746, the Supreme Court held that the six-month period is directory, not mandatory, and that a Family Court may waive it where it is satisfied that the parties have genuinely settled their differences, including alimony, custody and property, that there is no possibility of reconciliation, and that they have lived separately for a period exceeding the statutory minimum before the first motion.

ਹੋਰ ਪੜ੍ਹੋ

This is an application within the pending first-motion proceeding, not a separate suit — it asks the same Court, on the same case, to exercise the discretion Amardeep Singh recognises. Whether to grant it is entirely for the Court; nothing in this application, or in the parties' own agreement, obliges the Court to waive the period. Not for the second motion itself, once the period has run or been waived — use the Mutual Divorce Second Motion Petition for that. Not for a petition where the first motion has not yet been presented.

ਕੀ ਇਹ ਇੱਥੇ ਹੀ ਭਰਿਆ ਜਾ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ

ਇਹ ਇੱਥੇ ਹੀ ਭਰਿਆ ਜਾ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ

ਇਹ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਇਸੇ ਸਾਈਟ ਉੱਤੇ ਭਰ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ, ਅਤੇ ਕੁਝ ਵੀ ਤੈਅ ਕਰਨ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਪੂਰਾ ਖਰੜਾ ਸਕਰੀਨ ਉੱਤੇ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ। ਇਹ ਧਿਆਨ ਨਾਲ ਤਿਆਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਖਰੜਾ ਹੈ; ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਹਾਲਾਤ ਬਾਰੇ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ।

ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਭਰਨਾ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਕਰੋ

ਸਟਾਂਪ ਡਿਊਟੀ, ਰਜਿਸਟਰੀ ਅਤੇ ਗਵਾਹ ਵੇਖੋ

ਹੇਠਾਂ ਜੋ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਹੈ ਉਹ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਅਤੇ ਚੰਡੀਗੜ੍ਹ ਲਈ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਉੱਥੋਂ ਦੀ ਹੀ ਸਥਿਤੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਗਈ ਹੈ, ਇਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਕਿੱਥੇ-ਕਿੱਥੇ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਬਦਲਦੀ ਹੈ — ਭਾਵ ਹੇਠਲੀਆਂ ਰਕਮਾਂ ਉਹੀ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਲਾਗੂ ਹੁੰਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਦਰਾਂ ਬਦਲਦੀਆਂ ਰਹਿੰਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ, ਇਸ ਲਈ ਸਬ-ਰਜਿਸਟਰਾਰ ਦਫ਼ਤਰ ਤੋਂ ਪੱਕਾ ਕਰ ਲੈਣਾ ਠੀਕ ਰਹਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਜੇ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਰਟੀ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਿਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਹੈ, ਤਾਂ ਇਸ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਕੁਝ ਵੀ ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਲਈ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ।

ਸਟਾਂਪ ਡਿਊਟੀ

This application claims no monetary relief and is not itself an instrument creating or transferring a right, so no stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 is payable on it, in Punjab or in Chandigarh; a small fixed court-fee stamp under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as applicable in each place is the only charge, if the specific court's practice asks for one on an interim application of this kind. Confirm at the filing counter.

ਰਜਿਸਟਰੀ

Not a registrable instrument. This application is filed within the pending first-motion case and becomes part of the court's own record; any order the Court passes on it is a judicial order, not a document lodged with a Sub-Registrar.

ਨੋਟਰੀ

Each applicant should swear or affirm a supporting affidavit verifying the contents of this application, before a Notary Public, an Oath Commissioner attached to the court, or the court itself.

ਗਵਾਹ

No attesting witnesses are required for the application itself.

ਸਟੈਂਪ ਪੇਪਰ ਲਈ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਕਰੋ

Sample preview — placeholder answers, not your data

KAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASED

IN THE COURT OF THE FAMILY COURT, PANCHKULA

HMA No. 118 of 2026

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 13-B(2) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955, FOR WAIVER OF THE STATUTORY PERIOD, READ WITH AMARDEEP SINGH v. HARVEEN KAUR, (2017) 8 SCC 746

IN THE MATTER OF

Vikram Chopra, resident of House No. 1103, Sector 15, Panchkula 134113 ... APPLICANT NO. 1

AND

Ritika Chopra, resident of House No. 340, Sector 9, Panchkula 134109 ... APPLICANT NO. 2

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the Applicants presented the first motion of their joint petition for divorce by mutual consent under section 13-B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before this Hon'ble Court on 1 April 2026, registered as HMA No. 118 of 2026.

2. That before presenting the first motion, the Applicants had already lived separately for Two years and four months, well in excess of the one-year minimum required by section 13-B(1) of the Act.

3. That All disputes between the parties, including alimony and division of joint property, were finally settled and recorded in the first motion petition, and nothing remains outstanding between them.

4. That The parties, together with their respective families, made genuine efforts at reconciliation over several months before the first motion, without success, and there is no likelihood of reconciliation between them.

5. That the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, (2017) 8 SCC 746, has held that the period of six months prescribed by sub-section (2) of section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is directory and not mandatory, and that it may be waived where the Court is satisfied that the parties have genuinely settled their differences, that there is no likelihood of reconciliation, and that they have already lived separately for a period exceeding the statutory minimum before the first motion, so as to shorten the period of their agony.

6. That Continuing the statutory waiting period would only prolong the agony of the parties without any possibility of reconciliation, and both parties wish to move forward with their separate lives at the earliest.

7. That this application is filed in the State of Punjab, in the same proceeding as the first motion referred to above.

PRAYER

It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to waive the period of six months prescribed by sub-section (2) of section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and permit the Applicants to move the second motion of their joint petition before the expiry of that period.

Through Counsel: Rajeev Malhotra, Advocate

APPLICANT NO. 1 APPLICANT NO. 2

VERIFICATION

Verified at Panchkula on 2 April 2026 that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 7 of this application are true and correct to our respective knowledge, that no part of it is false and that nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

ਇਸ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ਼ ਨਾਲ ਅਕਸਰ ਇਹ ਵੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੇ ਹਨ

ਵਿਆਹ ਅਤੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਉੱਤੇ ਵਾਪਸ