Kaagazaat

Application for Mutation of Inheritance (Virasat / Fauti Intkal)

At a glance

Price
₹99 · GST included
Stamp duty
No stamp duty on the application — a s.34(1) report of an acquisition, not an instrument, so Schedule I-A doesn't bite.
Registration
Not registrable, nothing to register — s.17 needs an instrument; inheritance devolves by law, so the officer works from the death certificate, shajra nasab, heirship evidence and enquiry instead.
Witnesses
No attesting witnesses on the application; the affidavit is deposed, not witnessed.

₹99

GST included

Launch period: downloads are free for now. The prices shown apply once payments open.

Need more than this one? It’s part of the Transfer Property After a Death kit: 6 documents for ₹649 instead of ₹894. You save ₹245. See what’s in the kit

Guided questions, full draft on screen, download in Word.

See all prices

Also called

  • Virasat
  • Varasat
  • Warasat
  • Virasat Intkal
  • Fauti Intkal
  • Fouti Intekal
  • Fauti Intqal
  • Intkal-e-Virasat

Whether you can fill this in here

You can fill this in here

You can fill this one in on this site, and read the whole draft on screen before you decide anything about it. It is a carefully drafted template; it is not advice about your own facts.

Fill this one in
Why you need it

When you need it

Use when a Punjab khewatdar died and heirs want the jamabandi entry moved to them — the virasat/fauti intkal, the commonest revenue filing there is. No sale deed needed: inheritance vests by operation of law on death, and this only records it. S.34(1), Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 obliges reporting to the Halqa Patwari; s.39 lets the Collector fine up to 5x the fee if unreported within 3 months (discretionary) — file late anyway and use the delay paragraph. File online at jamabandi.punjab.gov.in (name, father's name, mobile OTP) or via the Halqa Patwari then Circle Revenue Officer; either way you still need the death certificate, shajra nasab and a sworn affidavit in person. NOT for: correcting an entry already IN the jamabandi (that's a Fard Badar — Manual para 7.30 bars mutation for it; para 7.29 splits CRO vs SDM by how far back it reaches); a registered-deed transfer (auto-triggered via Parcha Yadasht); a partition (ss.111-126, s.126 bars an Assistant Collector 2nd grade — your Naib Tehsildar — from taking it); land under consolidation (s.14, East Punjab Holdings Act, 1948) or shamlat deh (s.11, Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961; Collector, appeal to Commissioner in 60 days); a GMADA/GLADA/ADA/JDA/BDA/PDA allotment (that authority's own transfer branch) or a municipal property-tax record (a separate application to the Corporation/Council/Nagar Panchayat); or a Chandigarh revenue village (its own record via revenue.chd.gov.in — Chandigarh's auto-mutation wiring doesn't help an inheritance, which produces no deed) or Estate Office sector property (the Estate Officer's file, not a revenue counter). Not a title document: s.44 presumes the entry true only until disproved; s.45 sends real disputes to a declaratory suit (s.34, Specific Relief Act, 1963).

See stamp duty, registration and witnesses

What follows is written for Punjab. It states the position there rather than describing how it varies, so the amounts below are the ones that apply — worth confirming at the sub-registrar’s office, because rates change. If the property is anywhere else in India, none of this is yours.

Stamp duty

No stamp duty on the application — a s.34(1) report of an acquisition, not an instrument, so Schedule I-A doesn't bite. Any court-fee stamp is small/fixed (no line in the fee table — ask the counter). Punjab charges a Rs 600 mutation fee + Rs 200 pasting fee (Punjab Revenue Dept table, retrieved 6 Sep 2026 — undated, confirm at counter), levied under s.38 and recovered at attestation ONLY from the person favoured (Manual para 7.33 + s.38(2)); shamilat shares and each partition holding draw separate fees. Late reporting (past 3 months) risks a discretionary s.39 fine up to 5x the fee — Rs 3,000 ceiling, imposed by the Collector (the DC, not the CRO) — use the delay paragraph to ask for leniency. Annexure A's affidavit IS chargeable — Article 4, Schedule I-A (Punjab), a small fixed duty; e-stamp it in the deponent's own name (no affidavit line in the fee table — ask the counter). Real duty is on deeds executed ALONGSIDE this: a relinquishment, partition deed, or a family settlement that itself transfers rights (a bare memorandum of an already-completed arrangement usually isn't chargeable). The table prices a gift like a sale — 5% + 1% cess + 1% registration (capped Rs 2,00,000) + 1% PIDB + Rs 1,000-5,000 facilitation + Rs 200 pasting, on the higher of consideration or Collector rate — but has no line for relinquishment/partition, so get the article and amount from the Sub-Registrar first. A will is nil duty (Rs 4,000 registration, Rs 500 facilitation) — registration optional. Chandigarh has its own record and fees (revenue.chd.gov.in) — ask there, not here.

Registration

Not registrable, nothing to register — s.17 needs an instrument; inheritance devolves by law, so the officer works from the death certificate, shajra nasab, heirship evidence and enquiry instead. Registration and mutation ARE wired together: a registered deed triggers a Parcha Yadasht from Sub-Registrar to Tehsildar, then Kanungo to Patwari, and the intkal starts itself — inheritance produces no deed, so nothing triggers, hence the s.34(1) report is on you. THREE virasat-file documents DO need registration: a relinquishment/release deed (s.17(1)(b) — unreleased without it, and a plain consent letter releases nothing either); a partition deed if dividing rather than holding shares jointly (ss.111-126, before an Assistant Collector 1st grade+ — s.126 bars your 2nd-grade Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar; a consensual private partition is a 30-day notified service); and a family settlement that itself effects the transfer (a memorandum merely recording one already acted on isn't — Kale v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, (1976) 3 SCC 119). An attorney filing for heirs needs a REGISTERED power of attorney (para 1.2) — a general one conveys no title (Suraj Lamp v. State of Haryana, (2012) 1 SCC 656). A will needn't be registered (s.18, optional) and is valid unregistered if proved, though a registered one is easier to prove. Deed registration: 1-day notified service; certified copy: 7 days; non-encumbrance certificate: 3 days (NECIS, rcms.punjab.gov.in). Not title either: s.44 presumes only until disproved; s.45 sends real disputes to a declaratory suit.

Notarisation

The affidavit must be SWORN in person before a Notary (Notaries Act, 1952) or Oath Commissioner (District Judge/High Court appointed) — oath, signature, attestation, all in ten minutes; signed-at-home-stamped-at-shop doesn't count. Two traps: e-stamp in the DEPONENT'S own name, and carry original ID and enclosures separately (self-attested copies suffice for the file, originals for verification). The application itself needs no notarisation. An absent heir's consent letter is worth notarising (or attesting at the Indian Mission abroad) — it still doesn't release a share. The portal's OTP isn't an oath. A will's notarisation proves nothing about the will — that still needs an attesting witness under s.63, Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Witnesses

No attesting witnesses on the application; the affidavit is deposed, not witnessed. What matters instead is identification in open assembly: the Patwari enters, the Field Kanungo validates, and the Circle Revenue Officer attests with the Lambardar present and two respectable villagers who knew the deceased confirming the heirs — bring them, with ID. Heirs are checked against the shajra nasab (Manual para 7.41(1)); if it's stale, get a kursi nama attested by the Sarpanch or Patwari (s.35 obliges information; s.36 lets the officer decide and put a party in possession summarily). A WILL needs two attesting witnesses who saw the testator sign (s.63, Indian Succession Act, 1925), and proving it needs one surviving witness produced (s.67, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) — find them before filing. Consent signatures aren't witness signatures.

Talk to a lawyer about this document₹3,539 including GST (₹2,999 + 18% GST), per documentRequest Stamp Paper

Sample preview — placeholder answers, not your data

APPLICATION FOR MUTATION OF INHERITANCE

Virasat • Fauti Intkal — a report of acquisition by inheritance under section 34(1) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, and an application to enter the names of the legal heirs in the jamabandi in place of a deceased khewatdar


To

The Circle Revenue Officer (Naib Tehsildar), Assistant Collector 2nd Grade
Office of the Tehsildar, Tehsil Samrala, District Ludhiana, Punjab 141114

Through the Halqa Patwari of the estate, for entry in the register of mutations and report.

Place: Samrala Date: 3 April 2026

Subject: Report under section 34(1) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and application for mutation of virasat in the jamabandi of Village Bhundri (Hadbast No. 211), Tehsil Samrala, District Ludhiana, in respect of Khewat / Khatauni No. 271/298, on the death of Late Gurdial Singh on 1 April 2026

Sir / Madam,

1. Who is applying

1.1 I am Harbans Kaur, W/o Late S. Gurdial Singh, aged about 58 years, resident of House No. 42, Village Bhundri, Tehsil Samrala, District Ludhiana, Punjab 141114. Mobile: +91 XXXXX XXXXX Email: harbans.kaur@example.com

1.2 I make this application as the son of the deceased khewatdar named in paragraph 2. My identity document is Aadhaar ending 4321, and a copy is enclosed.

1.3 This is a report of the acquisition of a right by inheritance, made under section 34(1) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. I request that it be entered in the register of mutations under section 34(3) and that a receipt for it be given to me.

Request already filed online. A request for mutation of inheritance has been made through the online service on the Punjab Land Records portal at jamabandi.punjab.gov.in and bears reference VIR/LDH/2026/0043128. This application is filed in support of that request and not in substitution for it. I request that the two be treated as one case.

2. The khewatdar who has died

2.1 Late Gurdial Singh, S/o Late S. Inder Singh, last resident of House No. 42, Village Bhundri, Tehsil Samrala, District Ludhiana, Punjab 141114, stood recorded in the jamabandi of the estate as the sole recorded owner (malik) of the khewat, in respect of the land described in Schedule I to this application.

2.2 The share standing in the name of the deceased is: 1/2 share (4 kanal 8 marla out of 8 kanal 16 marla). Nothing beyond that share is the subject of this application.

2.3 The deceased died on 1 April 2026 at Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana. The death stands registered under registration number LDH/2026/0038112, issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, Municipal Corporation Ludhiana, on 21 June 2026. An attested copy of the death certificate is enclosed and the original will be produced at the time of attestation.

2.4 Succession to the estate of the deceased is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the deceased being Sikh.

2.5 On the date of death the share described in paragraph 2.2 vested in the legal heirs of the deceased by operation of law. This application seeks no transfer of any kind. It asks only that the revenue record be brought into line with what the law has already done.

Rapat already entered. The death has been reported to the Halqa Patwari and entered in the roznamcha waqiati as follows: Rapat No. 214 dated 9 June 2026 in the roznamcha waqiati of the Halqa Patwari. I rely on that entry as the date of my report for the purposes of section 39 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887.

Delay in reporting. This report is made more than three months after the date of death, and I set out the reason rather than leave this office to guess at it:

The deceased died in 2009. The heirs were then living outside the district and did not know that Khewat No. 271 still stood in his name. The position came to light only in August 2026, when a fard was obtained for the first time in order to raise a crop loan, and this application was prepared as soon as it did. The delay was not deliberate and no heir has been kept out of the record by it.

Section 39 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 makes a person who neglects to report an acquisition within three months liable, at the discretion of the Collector, to a fine not exceeding five times the amount of the fee. I respectfully submit that the neglect was neither wilful nor intended to keep the record, or any heir, out of the reckoning, that no person has been prejudiced by the delay, and that the record is being put right now of my own motion. I request that the discretion conferred by section 39 be exercised in my favour and that no fine be imposed; and if this office takes a different view, I ask to be heard before any fine is fixed.

3. Whether the deceased left a will

3.1 The position is: the deceased left no will, and succession is intestate.

Declaration as to intestacy. I have searched the papers of the deceased and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the deceased left no will, codicil or other testamentary paper. Succession to the share described in paragraph 2.2 is therefore intestate to that extent, and that share devolves on the heirs listed in Schedule II by operation of law.

4. Certificates about the heirs

4.1 For the record: a succession certificate under Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 relates to debts and securities and not to immovable property. No such certificate is required for the mutation now applied for, and none is relied upon in respect of the land in Schedule I. The heirs are to be verified against the shajra nasab of the estate held by the Halqa Patwari, in the order in which Punjab Land Records Manual para 7.41(1) requires the khewat to be arranged.

Certificate obtained. A legal heir certificate issued by the Tehsildar has been obtained. Particulars: Kursi nama dated 2 July 2026, attested by the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bhundri, and countersigned by the Halqa Patwari. A copy is enclosed.

5. The legal heirs and their shares

5.1 The persons named in Schedule II are the legal heirs of the deceased. They are the only persons entitled to succeed to the share described in paragraph 2.2, and no other person has any right of succession to it.

5.2 The shares shown against each heir in Schedule II have been worked out on this basis: equal shares among the Class I heirs, under section 8 and the Schedule to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Together they exhaust the share of the deceased and no more.

5.3 I have not concealed the name of any heir, and I have not shown as an heir any person who is not one.

5.4 The position of the heirs on this application is: Every heir named in Schedule II agrees to this application. Those who are present have signed below.

Minor heirs. One or more heirs are minors, as follows:

Arshdeep Singh, born 8 July 2014, is a minor. He is represented by his mother and natural guardian Smt. Paramjit Kaur, W/o Late S. Jagtar Singh, resident of Village Bhundri, Tehsil Samrala, District Ludhiana.

The share of a minor heir is to be recorded in the minor's own name, shown as being under the guardianship stated above. Nothing in this application seeks to deal with, encumber or release any minor's share.

A share already released. A share has been released by a registered deed, as follows:

Smt. Manjit Kaur has released her share in favour of the remaining heirs by a Release Deed registered as Document No. 1182 of 2026, Book No. 1, in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Samrala, on 22 August 2026.

The shares in Schedule II are stated after giving effect to that deed. A certified copy of the deed is enclosed.

6. Possession, revenue and pending matters

6.1 Since the death of the deceased the heirs named in Schedule II have been in joint possession of the land in Schedule I, cultivating it and meeting the land revenue and other dues payable on it, save as the jamabandi and the khasra girdawari themselves show otherwise. Apart from any tenant so recorded in the cultivation column, no third party is in possession of it under any claim.

6.2 To the best of my knowledge and belief, no suit, appeal, revision, review or other proceeding relating to succession to the estate of the deceased, or to the land in Schedule I, is pending before any court, tribunal or revenue authority, and no order of injunction, stay or attachment operates against the mutation now applied for.

6.3 To the best of my knowledge and belief the estate is not under consolidation proceedings under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, and the land in Schedule I is not the subject of any ceiling or land-acquisition proceeding. If a declaration under section 14 of that Act is in fact in force for this estate, I request that this application be forwarded to the Consolidation Officer having jurisdiction.

Persons who will identify the heirs. At the attestation in open assembly the following persons of the estate, who knew the deceased, will attend to identify the heirs and will bring their identity documents:

S. Jarnail Singh, S/o S. Kartar Singh, Lambardar of Village Bhundri

S. Amrik Singh, S/o S. Bant Singh, resident of Village Bhundri

7. What I ask this office to do

I respectfully pray that this office may be pleased to:

(a) enter this report in the register of mutations under section 34(3) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, allot it an intkal number, and give me a receipt for it;

(b) direct the Halqa Patwari to verify the death and the heirs against the shajra nasab and the jamabandi of the estate and to submit his report, and the Field Kanungo (girdawar) to check the entry;

(c) issue notice to every heir named in Schedule II at the addresses shown there, and cause the mutation to be attested in open assembly in the estate in the presence of the Lambardar, so that any objection may be heard;

(d) after enquiry, sanction the mutation of virasat, expunging the name of Late Gurdial Singh from Khewat / Khatauni No. 271/298 to the extent of the share described in paragraph 2.2, and entering the names of the heirs named in Schedule II in his or her place, each against the share shown against that heir in Schedule II;

Questions about this document

Does the Application for Mutation of Inheritance (Virasat / Fauti Intkal) need stamp paper or stamp duty in Punjab?

No stamp duty on the application — a s.34(1) report of an acquisition, not an instrument, so Schedule I-A doesn't bite. Any court-fee stamp is small/fixed (no line in the fee table — ask the counter).

Punjab charges a Rs 600 mutation fee + Rs 200 pasting fee (Punjab Revenue Dept table, retrieved 6 Sep 2026 — undated, confirm at counter), levied under s.38 and recovered at attestation ONLY from the person favoured (Manual para 7.33 + s.38(2)); shamilat shares and each partition holding draw separate fees.

Late reporting (past 3 months) risks a discretionary s.39 fine up to 5x the fee — Rs 3,000 ceiling, imposed by the Collector (the DC, not the CRO) — use the delay paragraph to ask for leniency.

Annexure A's affidavit IS chargeable — Article 4, Schedule I-A (Punjab), a small fixed duty; e-stamp it in the deponent's own name (no affidavit line in the fee table — ask the counter).

Real duty is on deeds executed ALONGSIDE this: a relinquishment, partition deed, or a family settlement that itself transfers rights (a bare memorandum of an already-completed arrangement usually isn't chargeable). The table prices a gift like a sale — 5% + 1% cess + 1% registration (capped Rs 2,00,000) + 1% PIDB + Rs 1,000-5,000 facilitation + Rs 200 pasting, on the higher of consideration or Collector rate — but has no line for relinquishment/partition, so get the article and amount from the Sub-Registrar first. A will is nil duty (Rs 4,000 registration, Rs 500 facilitation) — registration optional.

Chandigarh has its own record and fees (revenue.chd.gov.in) — ask there, not here.

Does the Application for Mutation of Inheritance (Virasat / Fauti Intkal) need registration in Punjab?

Not registrable, nothing to register — s.17 needs an instrument; inheritance devolves by law, so the officer works from the death certificate, shajra nasab, heirship evidence and enquiry instead.

Registration and mutation ARE wired together: a registered deed triggers a Parcha Yadasht from Sub-Registrar to Tehsildar, then Kanungo to Patwari, and the intkal starts itself — inheritance produces no deed, so nothing triggers, hence the s.34(1) report is on you.

THREE virasat-file documents DO need registration: a relinquishment/release deed (s.17(1)(b) — unreleased without it, and a plain consent letter releases nothing either); a partition deed if dividing rather than holding shares jointly (ss.111-126, before an Assistant Collector 1st grade+ — s.126 bars your 2nd-grade Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar; a consensual private partition is a 30-day notified service); and a family settlement that itself effects the transfer (a memorandum merely recording one already acted on isn't — Kale v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, (1976) 3 SCC 119).

An attorney filing for heirs needs a REGISTERED power of attorney (para 1.2) — a general one conveys no title (Suraj Lamp v. State of Haryana, (2012) 1 SCC 656).

A will needn't be registered (s.18, optional) and is valid unregistered if proved, though a registered one is easier to prove. Deed registration: 1-day notified service; certified copy: 7 days; non-encumbrance certificate: 3 days (NECIS, rcms.punjab.gov.in).

Not title either: s.44 presumes only until disproved; s.45 sends real disputes to a declaratory suit.

What does the Application for Mutation of Inheritance (Virasat / Fauti Intkal) cost on Kaagazaat?

₹99, GST included.

Launch period: downloads are free for now. The prices shown apply once payments open.

Does the Application for Mutation of Inheritance (Virasat / Fauti Intkal) need witnesses?

No attesting witnesses on the application; the affidavit is deposed, not witnessed. What matters instead is identification in open assembly: the Patwari enters, the Field Kanungo validates, and the Circle Revenue Officer attests with the Lambardar present and two respectable villagers who knew the deceased confirming the heirs — bring them, with ID. Heirs are checked against the shajra nasab (Manual para 7.41(1)); if it's stale, get a kursi nama attested by the Sarpanch or Patwari (s.35 obliges information; s.36 lets the officer decide and put a party in possession summarily). A WILL needs two attesting witnesses who saw the testator sign (s.63, Indian Succession Act, 1925), and proving it needs one surviving witness produced (s.67, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) — find them before filing. Consent signatures aren't witness signatures.

Often needed with this document

Back to Land records, title checks and approvals