Kaagazaat

Darkhwast Durustgi Khasra Girdawari (Application to Correct the Crop-Inspection and Possession Entry)

At a glance

Price: ₹99 · GST included
Stamp duty: No ad valorem stamp duty — not an instrument of transfer (unlike an actual Punjab sale, which draws 5% duty plus cess and fees).
Registration: Not registrable — section 17, Registration Act, 1908 doesn't reach a possession-record correction.
Witnesses: No statutory witness requirement (not a deed) — but witnesses matter MORE here than on any other revenue application, because this is a factual dispute about a field, resolved at a spot inspection.

₹99

GST included

Launch period: downloads are free for now. The prices shown apply once payments open.

Guided questions, full draft on screen, download in Word.

See all prices

Also called

Khasra girdawari correction application
girdawari correction
durustgi khasra girdawari
darkhwast durustgi girdawari
girdawari durust karan di darkhwast
girdawari theek karaun di arzi
khasra girdawari vich naam darj karaun di darkhwast
kabze di entry theek karan di darkhwast

Whether you can fill this in here

You can fill this in here

You can fill this one in on this site, and read the whole draft on screen before you decide anything about it. It is a carefully drafted template; it is not advice about your own facts.

Fill this one in

Why you need it

When you need it

The khasra girdawari records who's actually on the land — twice yearly, the Halqa Patwari walks the fields and enters, khasra by khasra, the owner, cultivator, crop and uncultivated area (kharif inspection from 1 October, rabi from 1 March, Para 9.1). It's Punjab's ordinary evidence of possession: crop compensation, a Kisan Credit Card, crop insurance, mandi and tenancy rights all run off it — which is exactly why it's quietly fought over. This application, to the Circle Revenue Officer under Para 9.9(f), is fundamentally different from a fard badar: it's a CONTESTED proceeding. Notice goes to the other side, both are heard, and in practice the officer orders a spot inspection (mauka) with the Nambardar and local residents present. A correction obtained without that hearing is worth little — the other side's first argument will be that he was never heard. There's a short clock: no correction after the harvest's kachha papers are drawn (Para 9.9(d)), and in practice this only reaches the CURRENT jamabandi period — file in the same agricultural year, ideally while the crop is still standing. Win, and you get a corrected possession record, not a decree — useful for compensation, loans and insurance, and strong evidence later, but ownership is decided only in civil court (s.44/45, PLRA). Overseas owners: this is the entry that drifts fastest while you're away — check it every kharif and rabi, and use a properly executed, stamped power of attorney if you file through an attorney. Don't use this: to change ownership (that's a mutation); to fix a clerical jamabandi error like a name or share (that's a fard badar); to win an actual ownership or possession dispute, especially with a civil suit already pending (the officer will wait for the court); to eject a tenant (a different Act, a different officer); for a boundary, partition, shamilat deh claim, or consolidation-related khewat error; for a special calamity-damage girdawari or a simple fact-recording rapat (quicker, uncontested — use that instead if a dispute isn't in play); for lal-dora/abadi habitation property (no crop inspection there); for a development-authority allotment; or for Chandigarh (no jamabandi or girdawari for sector property there).

See stamp duty, registration and witnesses

What follows is written for Punjab. It states the position there rather than describing how it varies, so the amounts below are the ones that apply — worth confirming at the sub-registrar’s office, because rates change. If the property is anywhere else in India, none of this is yours.

Stamp duty

No ad valorem stamp duty — not an instrument of transfer (unlike an actual Punjab sale, which draws 5% duty plus cess and fees). No mutation fee either, since no mutation is involved. Unlike a fard badar, a COURT FEE genuinely is payable here, because this is a contested proceeding before the Revenue Officer sitting as a revenue court: Schedule II, Court Fees Act, 1870 (as amended for Punjab, 2009) sets it at roughly Rs 10 for an application to a Revenue Officer — a weakly sourced figure, so confirm the exact article at the counter; it can be paid via e-stamp. The affidavit is arguably exempt under Article 4, Schedule I's court-filing exemption (since this Revenue Officer is sitting as a court) — an untested argument most counters will ignore anyway, so expect to buy a small stamp paper at a denomination this template can't source; ask the counter. Copying follows the same Rs 20/page scale as other revenue copies, though a khasra girdawari extract isn't clearly listed in the published table — ask which entry the counter charges under, and get it on the receipt. A computerised nakal's Rule 71-B fee remains unpublished. Chandigarh sector property has no khasra girdawari and nothing here to stamp.

Registration

Not registrable — section 17, Registration Act, 1908 doesn't reach a possession-record correction. File with the Halqa Patwari (who wrote the entry) or at the tehsil counter, or e-file on the Revenue Courts Management System (rcms.punjab.gov.in) — print the acknowledgment and hand the paper set to the Patwari too. Which counter is live is unsettled, as Fard Kendras may be merging into Sewa Kendras; ring ahead. How it's decided (Para 9.9(f)): notice to the other side, a hearing, and typically a spot inspection (mauka) with the Nambardar and local residents present, the Patwari producing the harvest book; an ordered correction is entered in red ink. The window is short: no correction after the harvest's kachha papers are drawn (Para 9.9(d)), and in practice only the CURRENT jamabandi period is reachable — file within the same agricultural year. No notified Right-to-Service time limit could be confirmed for this specific service (unlike copies or mutations) — ask in writing whether yours has been registered as one; contested revenue cases average around 437 days to disposal, so set expectations accordingly. Appeal an order to the Collector (30 days), then Commissioner (60 days), then Financial Commissioner (90 days) under sections 13/14, PLRA — get a certified copy of the order the same day, since the clock runs from the order date, not when you collect it. If the officer decides this is really a title dispute, the route becomes a civil suit (s.45, PLRA + s.34, Specific Relief Act, 1963) — not an appeal. What you get if you win is a corrected possession record carrying the section 44 presumption, not a decree.

Notarisation

The application itself needs no notarisation. The AFFIDAVIT, though, is close to essential here — not just office preference, since this is a contested possession case and your sworn account goes on file before the other side answers. Swear it before a Notary Public or an Oath Commissioner (Punjab & Haryana High Court), and check the register entry number and date are written on it before leaving — it will be attacked if the case is genuinely contested. The affidavit re-swears your possession, who you say is wrongly recorded, and any pending proceedings — matched carefully to your actual arrangement (self-cultivation, batai, cash rent) rather than over-swearing. Where there are joint applicants, each swears separately. Unusually, the APPLICANT should swear personally wherever reachable, including from abroad — an attorney swears only where the applicant genuinely cannot. An overseas applicant swears before an Indian consular officer, or notarises locally with apostille/legalisation. A power of attorney executed abroad must be stamped in India within three months of receipt (s.18, Stamp Act) and produced in original before the Patwari and the officer. Sworn statements from the Nambardar or local witnesses carry far more weight than unattested letters at the spot inspection. Never swear that nothing is pending when something is — a girdawari won on a false affidavit is both undone and remembered against you.

Witnesses

No statutory witness requirement (not a deed) — but witnesses matter MORE here than on any other revenue application, because this is a factual dispute about a field, resolved at a spot inspection. The Nambardar isn't a witness you control — the officer asks him, and his word carries real weight. Name the specific villagers or neighbours you want examined; naming nobody means the application asks for nothing. Bring documentary support too: electricity/diesel bills, seed or fertiliser invoices, an arhtiya's account, a mandi J-Form, insurance enrolment, lease or batai receipts — most Punjab tenancies are informal and unwritten, so receipts and witnesses together carry the case. The crop itself is the best evidence: ask for inspection while it's still standing, not after it's ploughed under. Crucially, name and give the address of the person on the other side of this dispute — notice must issue to him, and an order made without notice WILL be set aside on appeal. Each applicant signs and verifies separately; an attorney signs in their own name, with the power of attorney produced in original before the Patwari and the officer.

Talk to a lawyer about this document₹3,539 including GST (₹2,999 + 18% GST), per documentRequest Stamp Paper

Sample preview — placeholder answers, not your data

KAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASEDKAAGAZAAT SAMPLE — NOT PURCHASED

DARKHWAST DURUSTGI KHASRA GIRDAWARI

Application for correction of a wrong entry in the khasra girdawari (harvest inspection register), under Chapter 9 of the Punjab Land Records Manual and in particular paragraph 9.9(f) thereof, read with sections 31, 33, 36, 44 and 45 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887

To,

The Circle Revenue Officer (Naib Tehsildar), Assistant Collector Second Grade,
Tehsil Complex, Grain Market Road,
Tehsil / Sub-Tehsil Jagraon,
Sub-Division Jagraon,
District Amritsar, Punjab.

Through the Halqa Patwari of the revenue estate of Village Kaunke Kalan, Patwar Circle Kaunke.

Subject: Correction of the khasra girdawari — the column of cultivation (khana kasht) — for Kharif 2025 (sawani), and Rabi 2025-2026 (sadi), in respect of Khasra / Killa No(s). 14//7 (8-0), 14//8 (8-0) and 14//13 (7-12), total measuring 23 kanals 12 marlas, Khewat No. 212, of the revenue estate of Village Kaunke Kalan, Hadbast No. 141, Tehsil / Sub-Tehsil Jagraon, District Amritsar.

Filed electronically on the Revenue Courts Management System (rcms.punjab.gov.in): RCMS/LDH/JGN/CRO/2026/000814

Respected Sir / Madam,

1. The applicant

I, Gurmail Singh, son of Sh. Jagir Singh, aged about 54 years, by occupation agriculture, resident of Village Kaunke Kalan, Tehsil Jagraon, District Ludhiana, Punjab 142026, mobile +91 XXXXX XXXXX, Aadhaar No. ending 4471, most respectfully submit as follows.

I am the recorded owner (malik) of the said land, whose name stands in the ownership column of the jamabandi, and I am therefore a person concerned in the entry to which this application relates.

The applicant resides outside India. The applicant ordinarily resides at Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, and was accordingly not present in the revenue estate when the harvest inspection or inspections complained of were made. Notice and dates may be conveyed to him at the mobile number given above and at the address given above, and he undertakes to attend, personally or through his duly constituted attorney, on every date fixed by this Office.

Signed and presented by an attorney. This application is signed and presented on behalf of the applicant by his duly constituted attorney, Sh. Harpreet Singh, appointed under a General Power of Attorney dated 14 March 2024, executed before the Consulate General of India, Vancouver, and registered with the Sub-Registrar, Jagraon, on 2 May 2024. The original instrument of authority is produced herewith for inspection before the Halqa Patwari and before this Office, and a copy is filed with this application. The attorney signs at the foot of this application in that capacity and in no other.

Joint applicant. This application is made jointly with Jarnail Singh, son of Sh. Jagir Singh, who is likewise concerned in the cultivation of the said land and who signs and verifies at the foot of this application.

2. The land

The land to which this application relates is situate in the revenue estate of Village Kaunke Kalan, Tehsil / Sub-Tehsil Jagraon, District Amritsar, Punjab, and is described as follows.

Particular	As entered in the record
Revenue estate (mauza)	Kaunke Kalan
Hadbast number	Hadbast No. 141
Patwar circle	Patwar Circle Kaunke
Khewat No.	212
Khatauni No.	389
Khasra / Killa No(s).	14//7 (8-0), 14//8 (8-0) and 14//13 (7-12), total measuring 23 kanals 12 marlas
Total area	23 kanals 12 marlas
Current jamabandi of the estate	2021-2022
Harvests to which this application relates	Kharif 2025 (sawani), and Rabi 2025-2026 (sadi)

A nakal (copy) of the khasra girdawari for the said harvests, obtained on 2 April 2026, is filed with this application, and the entry complained of is marked upon it. A nakal jamabandi (fard) for the year 2021-2022 of the said revenue estate is also filed.

3. The entry complained of

3.1 The entry as it now stands. For Kharif 2025 and Rabi 2025-2026 the column of cultivation against Killa Nos. 14//7, 14//8 and 14//13 records Sh. Balkar Singh son of Sh. Nand Singh as the cultivator, and the crop is entered as paddy and wheat respectively as sown by him.

3.2 The entry as it ought to read. For Kharif 2025 and Rabi 2025-2026 the column of cultivation against Killa Nos. 14//7, 14//8 and 14//13 should record the applicant, Gurmail Singh son of Sh. Jagir Singh, as the cultivator, the paddy and the wheat having been sown, irrigated and harvested by him.

3.3 The column affected. The error appears in the column of cultivation (khana kasht) of the harvest inspection book of the said revenue estate, for Kharif 2025 (sawani), and Rabi 2025-2026 (sadi).

3.4 How the wrong entry came to be made. The applicant was in Canada from March 2025 to January 2026. During his absence Sh. Balkar Singh, a distant cousin who cultivates the adjoining killas, was present at the field when the kharif inspection was made and was recorded as cultivator. The entry was then carried forward into the rabi inspection without a fresh inquiry. No lease, theka or batai arrangement of any kind has ever existed between the applicant and Sh. Balkar Singh.

3.5 When it came to notice. The applicant first became aware of the wrong entry on or about 1 April 2026, and has come before this Office without avoidable delay since, the nakal of the khasra girdawari filed herewith having been obtained on 2 April 2026.

4. The applicant's cultivation and possession

4.1 The applicant has been in cultivating possession of the said khasra numbers since Kharif 2016, without a break in any harvest since, and has himself sown, irrigated and harvested the crop of each such harvest and borne the cost of cultivation, the produce being dealt with according to the footing upon which he holds the land, which is stated in clause 4.2 below.

4.2 The applicant holds and cultivates the said land upon the footing of ownership recorded in the ownership column of the jamabandi.

4.3 The crop now standing. There is at present standing upon the said khasra numbers a crop of wheat, sown in the first week of November 2025 and expected to be harvested in the second half of April 2026, sown by the applicant. It is the best and most immediate evidence of who is in cultivating possession, and the applicant prays that it be looked at before it is harvested and the opportunity is lost.

4.4 Under paragraphs 9.8 and 9.9 of the Punjab Land Records Manual the crops are to be entered in the khasra girdawari as the inspection proceeds, and changes in rights, rents and possession are to be recorded in the appropriate columns at the same time. The entry complained of does not record what was upon the land, and it does not record who was upon it.

5. The material relied upon

5.1 Documents. Nakal khasra girdawari for Kharif 2023 and Rabi 2023-2024 showing the applicant as cultivator; PSPCL agricultural tubewell connection bearing Account No. AP-3312/K in the applicant's name, with bills for the period April 2025 to March 2026; J-Form No. 1187 dated 22 October 2025 of the market committee for paddy sold from the said killas; fertiliser invoices dated 12 June 2025 and 3 November 2025 from the cooperative society; and the arhtiya's ledger account for the crop year 2025-2026.

5.2 Production of originals. The applicant will produce the originals of every document relied upon before the Halqa Patwari, before the Field Kanungo and before this Office as and when required, and will attend on any date that may be fixed.

5.3 Oral evidence. The applicant will produce, at the spot inspection or before this Office, the persons named in clause 8.6 below, who have personal knowledge of the cultivation of the said khasra numbers.

6. This is a correction of the record of possession and not a decision of title

6.1 The applicant does not by this application seek any mutation. A mutation (intkal) under section 34 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 is the instrument by which an acquisition of an interest by inheritance, purchase, mortgage or otherwise is brought upon the record, and nothing of that kind is asked for here. Nor does the applicant seek a fard badar under paragraph 7.29 of the Punjab Land Records Manual, which is the instrument for correcting a clerical error already carried into the jamabandi, and which paragraph 7.30 keeps distinct from the mutation machinery.

6.2 The applicant does not by this application seek any declaration of title, nor the creation, transfer, limitation, extension or extinguishment of any right in the said land. By section 44 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 an entry in a record-of-rights or in an annual record is presumed to be true only until the contrary is proved or a new entry is lawfully substituted for it, and by section 45 a person who disputes the correctness of an entry as a matter of right is left to his suit for a declaratory decree, now under section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Nothing sought here trespasses upon that.

6.3 Sections 31 and 33 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 provide for the record-of-rights of an estate and for the annual record prepared and maintained from it, and place upon the Revenue Officer the duty of seeing that the record is correctly made and kept. Section 36 of the same Act empowers a Revenue Officer, where a dispute exists as to an entry, to ascertain by summary inquiry the person in possession and to enter that person, leaving the question of right to be determined by a competent court. It is upon that footing, and no wider, that the applicant comes before this Office.

6.4 The correction sought takes nothing from any person that is his and gives the applicant nothing that he does not already hold. It asks only that the record say what was in fact upon the land in the harvests named.

Questions about this document

Does the Darkhwast Durustgi Khasra Girdawari (Application to Correct the Crop-Inspection and Possession Entry) need stamp paper or stamp duty in Punjab?

No ad valorem stamp duty — not an instrument of transfer (unlike an actual Punjab sale, which draws 5% duty plus cess and fees). No mutation fee either, since no mutation is involved.

Unlike a fard badar, a COURT FEE genuinely is payable here, because this is a contested proceeding before the Revenue Officer sitting as a revenue court: Schedule II, Court Fees Act, 1870 (as amended for Punjab, 2009) sets it at roughly Rs 10 for an application to a Revenue Officer — a weakly sourced figure, so confirm the exact article at the counter; it can be paid via e-stamp.

The affidavit is arguably exempt under Article 4, Schedule I's court-filing exemption (since this Revenue Officer is sitting as a court) — an untested argument most counters will ignore anyway, so expect to buy a small stamp paper at a denomination this template can't source; ask the counter. Copying follows the same Rs 20/page scale as other revenue copies, though a khasra girdawari extract isn't clearly listed in the published table — ask which entry the counter charges under, and get it on the receipt. A computerised nakal's Rule 71-B fee remains unpublished. Chandigarh sector property has no khasra girdawari and nothing here to stamp.

Does the Darkhwast Durustgi Khasra Girdawari (Application to Correct the Crop-Inspection and Possession Entry) need registration in Punjab?

How it's decided (Para 9.9(f)): notice to the other side, a hearing, and typically a spot inspection (mauka) with the Nambardar and local residents present, the Patwari producing the harvest book; an ordered correction is entered in red ink. The window is short: no correction after the harvest's kachha papers are drawn (Para 9.9(d)), and in practice only the CURRENT jamabandi period is reachable — file within the same agricultural year.

No notified Right-to-Service time limit could be confirmed for this specific service (unlike copies or mutations) — ask in writing whether yours has been registered as one; contested revenue cases average around 437 days to disposal, so set expectations accordingly. Appeal an order to the Collector (30 days), then Commissioner (60 days), then Financial Commissioner (90 days) under sections 13/14, PLRA — get a certified copy of the order the same day, since the clock runs from the order date, not when you collect it. If the officer decides this is really a title dispute, the route becomes a civil suit (s.45, PLRA + s.34, Specific Relief Act, 1963) — not an appeal. What you get if you win is a corrected possession record carrying the section 44 presumption, not a decree.

What does the Darkhwast Durustgi Khasra Girdawari (Application to Correct the Crop-Inspection and Possession Entry) cost on Kaagazaat?

₹99, GST included.

Launch period: downloads are free for now. The prices shown apply once payments open.

Does the Darkhwast Durustgi Khasra Girdawari (Application to Correct the Crop-Inspection and Possession Entry) need witnesses?

Bring documentary support too: electricity/diesel bills, seed or fertiliser invoices, an arhtiya's account, a mandi J-Form, insurance enrolment, lease or batai receipts — most Punjab tenancies are informal and unwritten, so receipts and witnesses together carry the case. The crop itself is the best evidence: ask for inspection while it's still standing, not after it's ploughed under.

Crucially, name and give the address of the person on the other side of this dispute — notice must issue to him, and an order made without notice WILL be set aside on appeal. Each applicant signs and verifies separately; an attorney signs in their own name, with the power of attorney produced in original before the Patwari and the officer.

Often needed with this document

Back to Land records, title checks and approvals